Multi-Cloud Migration Proposal Resume Project Example
A multi-cloud migration proposal that compares AWS and Azure landing zone patterns, defines NFRs for latency and residency, models three-year TCO, and aligns executives through ADRs and a phased wave plan—not hands-on Terraform apply.
Free to start · No credit card required
PRIYA NAIR
Solutions Architect
Project
Migration proposal
Executive-aligned- Authored multi-cloud migration proposal with landing zone options.
- Defined NFRs for latency, residency, and recovery targets.
- Aligned stakeholders with ADRs and phased wave roadmap.
Why this project is valuable
Architecture leadership signal
Migration proposals show you frame options, NFRs, and trade-offs for executives—not just deploy modules.
Good ATS coverage
Supports cloud migration, landing zone, NFRs, ADRs, TCO, and solutions architect keywords.
Decision-ready deliverables
ADRs and wave plans give leadership actionable choices with documented rationale.
Good interview depth
Discuss cloud selection criteria, residency constraints, cutover risk, and stakeholder workshops.
Project overview
A multi-cloud migration proposal is strong solutions architect resume material because enterprise moves start with aligned architecture decisions before any infrastructure provisioning.
Current-state assessment catalogued 120 applications by coupling and data gravity; landing zone options compared AWS Control Tower versus Azure Enterprise Scale patterns at the account and policy level; NFRs captured p95 latency, RPO/RTO, and data residency; ADRs recorded why hybrid connectivity favored ExpressRoute over VPN for tier-1 workloads.
On a resume, that gives you ways to describe workshop facilitation, TCO spreadsheets, migration wave grouping, risk registers, and architecture board presentations—not kubectl or Terraform apply logs.
Architecture overview
Project flowCurrent-state assessment
Application inventory scores coupling, compliance class, and migration complexity.
NFR definition
Latency, availability, RPO/RTO, and residency requirements documented per workload tier.
Landing zone options
Multi-account structure, identity federation, and logging baselines compared across AWS and Azure.
ADR decisions
Architecture Decision Records capture cloud selection, connectivity, and identity patterns.
Wave planning
Applications grouped into migration waves by dependency order and business risk.
Executive readout
Proposal deck presents TCO, risks, and recommended path for steering committee approval.
What this project includes
- Application inventory and complexity scoring
- Landing zone reference design comparison
- NFR catalog with tiered RPO/RTO targets
- ADRs for cloud and connectivity choices
- Three-year TCO model with assumptions
- Phased migration wave roadmap
Tech stack
Migration proposals emphasize reference architectures and ADRs at the design level—delegating IaC implementation to platform engineering.
AWS Landing Zone
Reference multi-account structure, org policies, and centralized logging pattern.
Azure Landing Zone
Enterprise-scale subscription hierarchy and policy baseline for comparison.
ADRs
Documents decision rationale for cloud, connectivity, and identity choices.
NFR Catalog
Captures non-functional requirements per workload classification.
TCO Model
Compares three-year cost scenarios with explicit assumption tables.
Migration Waves
Sequences application moves by dependency and business criticality.
Features implemented
Option comparison
Side-by-side landing zone patterns prevent vendor lock-in by accident.
Residency-aware design
NFRs enforce data location constraints in target region selection.
ADR traceability
Future teams understand why ExpressRoute beat VPN for tier-1.
Wave-based risk reduction
Low-complexity apps migrate first to prove landing zone readiness.
Executive TCO narrative
Finance receives assumptions and sensitivity scenarios, not raw quotes.
Hybrid connectivity strategy
Architecture-level network design without cable-by-cable ops detail.
Resume bullet examples
These bullets frame migration as architecture leadership—not Terraform operator work.
- Authored multi-cloud migration proposal comparing AWS and Azure landing zone patterns with NFR catalog covering latency, residency, and tiered RPO/RTO targets.
- Facilitated stakeholder workshops and captured ADRs documenting cloud selection, ExpressRoute connectivity, and federated identity baseline decisions.
- Built three-year TCO model and phased migration wave roadmap grouping 120 applications by dependency order and compliance class.
- Presented architecture board readout aligning executives on recommended landing zone path, risk register, and cutover governance model.
Skills demonstrated
This project demonstrates cloud migration architecture, ADRs, NFR definition, and executive alignment.
Architecture
Migration
Leadership
ATS keywords extracted from this project
Use solutions architect and migration design keywords—not hands-on K8s operator terms.
Interview questions based on this project
Migration proposals invite landing zone and NFR trade-off questions.
How did you choose between AWS and Azure?
Existing enterprise agreement, residency-certified regions, and team skill mix scored against landing zone fit; ADR captured the weighted decision matrix.
What NFRs drove design?
Tier-1 workloads needed 15-minute RPO and sub-200ms p95 to on-prem ERP; that ruled out async-only replication patterns.
How did you sequence waves?
Low-coupling internal tools migrated first to validate landing zone guardrails before customer-facing payment services.
How would you improve the proposal?
Add formal disaster recovery drill criteria per wave and a FinOps chargeback model tied to account structure.
Common mistakes
Describe landing zone design and ADRs—implementation belongs to platform teams unless you did both.
Workshops and executive readouts show solutions architect delivery.
NFRs and wave planning show modernization thinking.
Option comparison proves vendor-neutral architecture leadership.
FAQ
Is a migration proposal a good solutions architect project?
Yes. Enterprise architects spend significant time on proposals before any infrastructure is built.
Do I need live cloud accounts?
Reference architecture diagrams, ADRs, and TCO models are valid portfolio artifacts.
Should I mention ADRs?
Yes. They are high-signal evidence of decision discipline.
How many bullets should I use?
Two to four bullets on landing zone design, NFRs, ADRs, and stakeholder alignment.
Turn project details into resume evidence
Use this migration proposal to strengthen your solutions architect resume
Present landing zone design, ADRs, and recruiter-friendly executive alignment with stronger keyword alignment.
Free to start · No credit card required